I saw the trailer for Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice this weekend, and I couldn’t help asking: Is this what they think we want in a Superman film?
It looks dark, depressing, and charmless – the exact opposite of what I would hope to see in a Superman film. Of course, trailers don’t always perfectly represent the movies that they’re trying to sell. But the fact that Man of Steel already rebooted the Superman series in such a lackluster way doesn’t bode well for this bloated-looking sequel.
It’s been 35 years since we’ve seen a truly amazing Superman film – Superman II. I don’t mean to slight Superman: The Movie at all. It is practically perfect, and somehow its sequel managed to be even better. That’s an incredible feat considering all the behind-the-scenes drama that took place with Richard Donner quitting as director, Marlon Brando demanding too much money to reprise his role as Jor-El, Director of Photography Geoffrey Unsworth passing away, and Tom Mankiewicz not returning to revise his script.
Superman II set a high water mark for comic book films that took decades for anyone else to come close to. So, is Superman II as good as it gets for Superman films? Let’s find out.
Superman II and Spider-Man 2
I should point out that Superman II has been surpassed by other comic book films in recent years. Spider-Man 2 was the first one to achieve a new level of greatness in the genre. Appropriately enough, it did that by using everything that worked in Superman II, but doing it a little better.
It’s got a fantastic love story, a hero struggling with the loss of his superpowers, his girlfriend discovering his secret identity, and some of the best fight scenes ever put to film.
The first time I saw Spider-Man and Doctor Octopus fall onto the top of a fast-moving train, I got chills because I knew I was in for an epic experience. I hadn’t felt that way about any scene from a comic book movie since the Metropolis fight between Superman and the three Kryptonians. Both of those scenes manage to build the tension by creating new challenges for the hero to overcome. The heroes and villains keep changing tactics as they learn new things about the hero. Those scenes are the highlights of their films, and they come at the perfect moment after the heroes have gone through so many struggles on their way to regaining their powers.
Now compare that to the Smallville fight in Man of Steel, which doesn’t feel earned, but perfunctory. It’s purely eye candy and there’s no real progression or point to it. Superman and his enemies pound on each other and no one gets hurt or comes any closer to winning or losing. At least Superman II took the time to acknowledge Superman’s desire to protect Earthlings – a “weakness” that General Zod attempted to exploit.
Mind Over Muscle
The best thing about Superman II is the way that Superman wins. He doesn’t just keep wailing on his enemies in the hopes that they’ll surrender. He’s outnumbered and his enemies know he’ll do anything to protect the ones he loves. Since he can’t win by simply using his brawn, he realizes the only way he can come out on top is if he uses his brain.
Seeing Superman crush Zod’s hand and toss him away like a ragdoll after outsmarting him is quite possibly the quintessential Superman moment. It’s so memorable because the movie has created such a perfect villain. Zod has been untouchable up to that moment. Every weapon that has been thrown at him has barely slowed him down, and he’s usually calm and in control of every situation. It is totally satisfying to see Superman finally put him in his place.
That is what I wish Superman would do more of. Sure, he’s strong enough to destroy almost any foe, but it’s so much more interesting to see him think his way out of problems. We see a glimpse of that in Superman III when he outwits and destroys a malevolent supercomputer, but that one great moment doesn’t make up for the film’s many shortcomings.
Tough Act to Follow
How do you make a better Superman film than Superman II? I’d really like to know. I mean, Superman II isn’t a perfect film. The first part of the film in Paris has always struck me as rather convoluted and weak. And the part in Metropolis where Clark Kent is so inept that he lets a car smash into him is bizarre. The Niagara Falls scenes are handled competently, but they’re missing that little something extra that Richard Donner always added to his action sequences in Superman: The Movie.
As soon as Zod, Ursa, and Non start causing trouble and Lois discovers Clark is Superman, the movie is pitch perfect from then on. All of the scenes with Lex Luthor are great, too.
What I want in a Superman film is wit, humor, heroics, and characters I can root for and against. I didn’t find many of those things in Man of Steel, and I worry I’ll find even fewer of them in its sequel.
It’s not that I want a continuation of the original Superman series or a film done exactly in that style. I enjoyed Superman Returns, but it felt too much like a retread of the original Superman: The Movie, instead of moving forward and telling its own story. I don’t want filmmakers to try to duplicate the success of the past, but to press on and find a new story that is worthy of this wonderful character.
No one has managed to top Spider-Man 2 in that franchise and I worry that Superman II might be the best we’ll ever see in this superhero franchise. If that’s the case, then it’ll prove Lois’s words at the end of the film to be prophetic, “You’re kind of a tough act to follow.”
Yes, you are, Superman II. Yes, you are.
This is the Deja Reviewer bidding you farewell until we meet again.
All images are the copyright of their owners.
Have you watched Superman II – The Richard Donner Cut? I found it far better than official Superman II. Basically all the footage you like in the released sequel is actually Donner’s stuff. And the new footage added by Lester (Paris, etc) is in fact what is not that impressive. Besides, the Donner cut is totally related with Superman – The Movie, making a 4 hours-long epic. The most important scene is the one with Brando appearing for the last time to grant Superman his powers again (in Lester’s film, it is an awkawrd moment with a crystal which explains this).
I have seen the Richard Donner Cut, and I’m a little torn about it. I really like the fact that Superman’s decision in the first film to throw the missile into space is what frees the Kryptonians. It eliminates the need for that awkward scene in Paris. And I definitely liked how Lois threw herself off the Daily Planet to try to get Clark Kent to reveal himself as Superman.
But I have to admit I wasn’t all that impressed by the Marlon Brando scenes. Yeah, the crystal giving Clark his powers back in the theatrical cut is a little anticlimactic, but I absolutely love the moments leading up to it when Clark is absolutely anguished and pleading for his father to help him.
If there was a cut that took that great stuff from Lester and Donner and meshed them together, I would probably love that the best. As is, I can’t help loving the theatrical cut a bit more than the Donner Cut, simply because it’s the one I grew up with.
Pingback: 10 Movies About Aliens That Don’t Have Any Language Barriers | Deja Reviewer
Pingback: Modern Hollywood Trends the Salkinds Were Doing Decades Ago | Deja Reviewer
Pingback: Unceremonious Ways Sequels Dump the Previous Film’s Love Interest | Deja Reviewer
Pingback: Why This Is My Favorite Scene in Any Superman Film | Deja Reviewer
Pingback: Carrie Fisher vs. Margot Kidder | Deja Reviewer
Pingback: 11 Things I’ve Come to Like About Superman III | Deja Reviewer
Pingback: There Are Only 2 Kinds of Superman Movies | Deja Reviewer
Pingback: Sequels That Show What Happened Right After the First Film’s End Credits Rolled | Deja Reviewer
The Richard Donner cut is nothing more than a curiosity at best and is NOT better than the official movie. The official Superman II implied a lot of things that let the audience fill in the blanks. Yes, there was a time when movie goers were more sophisticated and the movie studio actually do not insult your intelligence. The Paris terrorists and Niagara Falls sequences suggest Superman II took place much later than Superman I…so Lois is now used to getting herself into jams to get a scoop and is now accustomed to being saved by Superman. There apparently have been other incidences where Clark conveniently disappearing whenever Superman appears…making Lois suspicious. The green crystal? Again, it let the audience fill in the blanks, It does NOT force feed you. With the long unreleased Marlon Brando scenes surfacing, one can now also speculate that this what happened offscreen. In final analysis, Superman II is a hard act to follow, and the Richard Donner cut does not surpass it.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I totally agree. Growing up with the theatrical version, I will always consider it the better version.
I like “Superman: The Movie”, despite my growing awareness of its flaws. I can tolerate “Superman Returns”. I love both “Man of Steel” and “Batman v. Superman”. I think “Superman II” is a pile of shit.
Wow. I am quite the inverse when it comes to the last three films you mentioned. That’s fine, though. The scene in Superman II where Clark returns to the Fortress of Solitude is more emotional and better than anything in Man of Steel or Batman v Superman. https://youtu.be/8AeGUP2rMOU
Pingback: Do Rotten Sequels Spoil Great Previous Films? | Deja Reviewer